blake and mouton managerial grid questionnaire

The results of the overall research is unclear and inconclusive, although some of the findings suggested the value of a leader being both highly task oriented and highly relationship oriented in all situations. However, the Michigan researchers thought that their two behaviors were opposite end of a single continuum while the Ohio State researchers thought that their two behaviors were not a part of the same continuum and that the degree to which a leader exhibits one behavior does not affect the degree to which a leader exhibits the other. So, essentially, they came up with the same basic ideas about leaders’ behaviors. Their findings were similar in that the two types of behaviors listed by one mirrored the two types of behaviors listed by the other. The Michigan studies were done by observing the impact of leasers’ behaviors on the performance of small groups. The Ohio State studies were done by giving a questionnaire to people to analyze how people acted when they were leading a group.

How were the findings similar and different? What were the overall findings in the collaborative studies in the 1950s and 1960s? Summarize the research methods and results of the Ohio State and Michigan studies.The central purpose of the style approach is to explain how leaders combine two kinds of behavior to influence followers in their efforts to reach a goal. Relationship behaviors help followers feel comfortable with themselves, with each other, and with the situation in which they find themselves. Task behaviors facilitate goal accomplishment, meaning that they help group members achieve their objectives. There are two types of behaviors in this approach. This behavioral approach focuses on what leaders do and how they act. The style approach emphasizes the behaviors of a leader. What is the central purpose of the style approach? Explain the style/behavioral approach and two general kinds of behaviors.

Blake and mouton managerial grid questionnaire